Between Catastrophe and Dawn: Krasznahorkai’s “The Melancholy of Resistance” and the Fragility of Being Wani Nazir

​Between Catastrophe and Dawn: Krasznahorkai’s “ The Melancholy of Resistance” and the Fragility of Being

Wani Nazir

The 9th Issue of LitStream, A Weekly Literary Supplement Of The HEADLINES TODAY NEWSPAPER Edited By DR BASHARAT KHAN Is Here!

chogalwriter76@gmail.com 

Your Newspaper is just a click away...

https://www.dailyheadlinestoday.com/epaper/view/1182/headlines-today

https://litstream.blogspot.com/2025/10/the-9th-issue-of-litstream-weekly_18.html

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1AD9rod3BB/

The Melancholy of Resistance (1989) by László Krasznahorkai (2025 Nobel Prize Winner) is a book about a world that is both familiar and scary. The story takes place in a community that is about to fall down, where turmoil, public displays, and decay disrupt the normal flow of life.  

​The writing style sets a pattern of excess and intensity from the start, as shown by the word "Catastrophe ! Of course! Last judgement! Horseshit! … you can only mew and caterwaul …”. This angry criticism of flowery language shows that words have lost their relation to reality in society, making it hard for everyone to understand. There are short moments of clarity that help balance out the novel's overpowering nature. For example, “ everything about him regained its original significance … the window became a window you could look out again. ”. These times show that the human mind can still feel amazement, even while things are falling apart.  

​Krasznahorkai's narrative is based on 20th-century literature and philosophy. The town in the book reminds me of the bizarre places in Kafka's stories, where bureaucratic systems, secret powers, and creepy people rule the lives of normal people. The big, still whale in the town square reminds me of Kafka's strange machines, which are constantly there but never fully understood and change people's behaviour just by being there. Like in The Trial, it's not clear who is in charge. It looks like Mrs. Eszter's bureaucratic actions are a reaction to a state of disorder that comes from both inside and outside the organisation.  

​The way the work is written, its syntax, is comparable to Thomas Bernhard's, with a persistent sense of repetition and a deep, compulsive awareness that runs through one's thoughts. Krasznahorkai uses long, continuous paragraphs to collect pictures, thoughts, and feelings in a smooth, almost musical style. One character is so fascinated that he can't do anything else:

 “He gained height, grew thin, the hair on his temples had begun to grey … trapped him in a bubble of time, in one eternal, impenetrable and transparent moment”. Time becomes a space between worlds, both close and far away, which is similar to Proust's work on duration and Bergson's thoughts on inner time.  

​The story deals with existential problems from a philosophical point of view, such as how individuals feel lost in a world where nothing is certain, how morality is shaky, and how societal institutions are always changing. Krasznahorkai addresses these worries in the context of the breakdown of society, politics, and the body.  

​The references to “the last judgement” and “catastrophe” are both real and metaphorical, and they make people feel true fear. When he writes, “ Everything was there … but the realm that existed once … had disappeared for ever, ground into infinitesimal pieces by the endless momentum of chaos”, you can see how history and society are always falling apart. This reminds me of Walter Benjamin's "angel of history," who is pushed back by forces that can't be understood, while people try to grasp on to bits and pieces of real life.  

​The book is also a study of political allegory. The narrative is written around the end of the Eastern Bloc and is about how ideologies are uncertain and institutions are unstable. The circus and its dead whale stand for things that come from outside and cause dread, mockery, and instability. Mrs. Eszter's strictness shows how society reacts to what it thinks is disorder.  

​There is still a chance of resistance, though it may be minimal. This can happen through thoughts, perceptions, or small moral actions. “ All normal expectations went by the board … there was nothing anyone could do except to get a tenacious grip on anything that was still tangible”. These actions, no matter how tiny, show that you are making moral choices that go against the disintegration around you.  

​In the book, language is both a source of tyranny and a way to be saved. Krasznahorkai says that people shouldn't use inflated rhetoric when they write, like when he says “ you don’t talk, you ‘whisper’ or ‘expostulate’; you don’t walk down the street but ‘proceed feverishly’; you don’t enter a place but ‘cross its threshold’ …”. Still, language lets us see, wonder, and connect with each other when " he would discover the hidden depths of human existence … the enormous joys of mutuality … threading the planets and the stars”. Words can be used as weapons and instruments for spying and lying, as well as techniques to reach a higher state of being. Attention, contemplation, and moral perception are little actions of resistance that bring people and the vastness of space closer together.  

​

​The body and the apocalypse are linked in Krasznahorkai's story. When he says, “ The unchained workers of decay were waiting … to dismantle whatever had been alive once and once only … under the eternally silent cover of death,” death, decay, and decline are all around and clear. Even with all the damage, people may still sense beauty and connection. A fire that keeps you warm and a window that you can see through both show the need for grounding and moral attentiveness. “ Everything about him regained its original significance … the window became a window you could look out again”. When things are going wrong, perception becomes a way to fight against destruction and confirm what you see.  

​In Krasznahorkai's book, time doesn't move in a straight line. When he says, “ he would finally know that our every moment is passed in a procession across dawns and day’s-ends … threading the planets and stars, ” time is stuck, repeating, and cosmic. Human experience is restricted and sensitive, yet it touches on greater patterns of time. This suggests a sense of something beyond individual misery, but it doesn't promise escape. It's just as vital to know that there is order in the universe as it is to know how weak people are.  

​The book has philosophical ties to prior works. Krasznahorkai's work combines Kafka's sense of being disconnected, Beckett's basic and sparse style, Camus's sense of absurdity, and Bernhard's repetitious writing. Despair is something that affects us physically, morally, and socially. This is where the issues with morals after the "death of God" come into play. Even when historic buildings are crumbling apart, people still talk about judgement and tragedy. Ancient structures are "a burden of legacy even as the old structures fall apart". Arendt's studies of dictatorship can be seen in the bureaucratic displays and mass panic, while McCarthy's dark surroundings are similar to decay.  

​Krasznahorkai's story is quite expressive, full of moments of amazement and important truths. The main character's realisation of connectedness is nearly spiritual as he says, “ he would discover the enormous joys of mutuality … threading the planets and the stars”. These times of insight are fragile and depend on somebody else. They do show that people can concentrate, recognise things, and make moral choices. When you experience the warmth of a fire or see how important a window is, things become clear like “ everything about him regained its original significance … the window became a window you could look out again”.  

​The book doesn't try to make complicated decisions easier. People often feel stuck and try to make sense of things when progress slows down. The main character sees their life as a series of escapes, going “ from meaninglessness into music, from music to guilt, from guilt and self-punishment into pure ratiocination”. Finally, the main character starts to accept a simpler view of life, one that is basic and real, when he realises that “ it was enough to notice and observe that which he actually possessed”. Existential needs including moments of amazement, moral awareness, and being present, which demonstrate little acts of affirmation in the midst of deterioration.  

​The Melancholy of Resistance by Krasznahorkai is a deep look at how we see things, what is right and wrong, and how people keep going. The book raises questions about how we comprehend things, from the heated criticism of excessive language to the bright epiphany of cosmic interconnection. People can fight against chaos and decay by paying attention, observing, and being aware of what is right and wrong. The Melancholy of Resistance is a deep look at what it means to be human. Does human meaning last, even if it's weak, in a world that is always falling apart? Krasznahorkai sounds like a real person who is attentive and insistent to confirm existence itself is as easy as perceiving, attending, or resisting.